ISSN 2456-2653
Contact us
Social Science and Humanities Journal
ISSN 2456-2653
Submit Paper
  1. 🏠 Home
  2. 📔 Vol. 10 · No. 03 · (2026)
  3. Addressing Discipline Specific Language Challenges: A Needs …
Original Research🔓 Open Access

Addressing Discipline Specific Language Challenges: A Needs Analysis of Tailored Language Instruction at a University in Vietnam

Social Science and Humanities JournalVol. 10 · No. 03 · (2026)📅 March 28, 2026pp. 9932-9946DOI: 10.18535/sshj.v10i03.2218 ↗
👁 2,701   ⬇ 437
Abstract
This study investigates the specific language challenges faced by students in various academic disciplines, using both quantitative and qualitative approaches. The quantitative data, analyzed through ANOVA and Tukey HSD tests, revealed significant differences in perceived language difficulties among students in engineering, healthcare sciences, business, and humanities and languages. Students in technical fields, particularly engineering and healthcare sciences, reported the greatest language challenges, especially with mastering discipline-specific terminology and effectively communicating complex concepts. In contrast, students in humanities and languages faced fewer challenges, while business students experienced moderate difficulties, particularly in business communication tasks. Qualitative data from focus group discussions provided nuanced insights, revealing that students in technical disciplines require more focused instruction on technical language and communication. The findings highlight the need for tailored language instruction that addresses the unique needs of each discipline. This study underscores the importance of adopting discipline-specific language programs to better support students' academic success and professional development.
Keywords:Language challengesdiscipline-specific language instructionneeds analysisacademic disciplines
How to Cite
Nguyen Thi Hai Oanh (2026). Addressing Discipline Specific Language Challenges: A Needs Analysis of Tailored Language Instruction at a University in Vietnam. Social Science and Humanities Journal, 10(03), 9932-9946. https://doi.org/10.18535/sshj.v10i03.2218

References

  1. Anderson, R. C. (1977). The notion of schemata and the educational enterprise: General discussion of the conference. In R. C. Anderson, R. J. Spiro, & W. E. Montague (Eds.), Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge (pp. 415-431). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  2. Baker, C. (2011). Foundations of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. Multilingual Matters.
  3. Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31(1), 21-32.
  4. Cargill, M., & O'Connor, P. (2019). Writing Scientific Research Articles: Strategy and Steps. Wiley-Blackwell.
  5. Cummins, J. (2009). Bilingual and immersion programs. In M. Long & C. Doughty (Eds.), The Handbook of Language Teaching (pp. 161-181). Wiley-Blackwell.
  6. Dudley-Evans, T., & St John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for Specific Purposes: A Multi-Disciplinary Approach. Cambridge University Press.
  7. Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford University Press.
  8. Fang, Z. (2018). Scientific Literacy: Theory and Practice. Routledge.
  9. Flowerdew, J., & Costley, T. (2017). Discipline-Specific Writing: Theory into Practice. Routledge.
  10. Holmes, J., & Riddiford, N. (2018). English for Social Sciences. Cambridge University Press.
  11. Hyland, K. (2020). English for Academic Purposes: Theory and Practice. Routledge.
  12. Hyland, K. (2013). Writing in the University: Education, Knowledge and Reputation. Routledge.
  13. Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2007). Is there an “academic vocabulary”? TESOL Quarterly, 41(2), 235-253.
  14. Hyland, K. (2006). English for Academic Purposes: An Advanced Resource Book. Routledge.
  15. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365-379.
  16. Kim, J. (2020). Critical thinking and academic writing in the humanities: A needs analysis. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 45, 101-115.
  17. Long, M. H. (2005). Second Language Needs Analysis. Cambridge University Press.
  18. Nguyen, T. T., & Pham, L. D. (2021). Vietnam’s National Foreign Language Project: Progress and Challenges. MOET Policy Report.
  19. Paltridge, B., & Starfield, S. (Eds.). (2013). The Handbook of English for Specific Purposes. Wiley-Blackwell.
  20. Piaget, J. (1971). Biology and knowledge: An essay on the relations between organic regulations and cognitive processes. University of Chicago Press.
  21. Snow, C. E. (2010). Learning to Read: Lessons from Longitudinal Research. Harvard University Press.
  22. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
  23. Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem-solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89-100.
  24. Zwiers, J. (2014). Building Academic Language: Meeting Common Core Standards Across Disciplines, Grades 5-12. Jossey-Bass.