ISSN 2456-2653
Contact us
Social Science and Humanities Journal
ISSN 2456-2653
Submit Paper
  1. 🏠 Home
  2. 📔 Vol. 8 · No. 07 · (2024)
  3. The Driving of Participatory and Achievement-Focused Integra…
Articles🔓 Open Access

The Driving of Participatory and Achievement-Focused Integration Process as A Solution to Grassroots Economy in The COVID 19-Era Using Management of Knowledge and Research to Benefit Community and Society: A Case Study of Nakhon Si Thammarat Province

Social Science and Humanities JournalVol. 8 · No. 07 · (2024)📅 July 17, 2024pp. 4400-4409DOI: 10.18535/sshj.v8i07.1210 ↗
👁 232   ⬇ 64
📄 Download PDF
Abstract

The drive for Participatory and Achievement-focused integration process as a Solution to Grassroots Economy in the COVID 19-Era aims to manage the participatory and achievement-driven integration, coordinate the integration, participatory, and productive efforts of government agencies, the private sector, civil society and communities in solving problems and developing the Grassroots Economy. The target groups include farmers and entrepreneurs in Nakhon Si Thammarat Province. The tools used in the research were questionnaires, visit forms, interview forms and an evaluation form for knowledge management and research for community and social use. The results of the project were found that: 1. The driving of Participatory and Achievement-focused integration process as a Solution to Grassroots Economy in the COVID 19-Era using Management of Knowledge and Research to benefit community and society consisted of 5 major stages, divided into sub-stages as follows: Action Plan Stage: (Planning); with 6 sub-stages, Action Stage: (Doing); with 2 sub-stages, Action Project Monitoring and Evaluation (Checking) with of 2 sub-stages, Improvement and Development Stage: (Acting); with 2 sub-stages, and Action Reflection Stage: (Reflection); by the meeting of researcher, publishing and disseminating academic articles in national journals. 2. The results of promoting and coordinating the integration of government agencies, the private sector, civil society and communities found that all departments cooperated and demonstrated readiness to promote and support the project, including partaking in monitoring and extending the results of every project. 3. The results of monitoring and evaluation of the project implementation suggested that 1) every sub-project had its objectives lined in consistency with the policy of Thailand’s Ministry of Agriculture, 2) increase income for farmers and communities, 3) farmers, entrepreneurs and communities express a high level of satisfaction with the project implementation, 4) the project helps build a career, generate income, and so a better quality of life, 5) Create participation and integration of agencies in the development of Grassroots Economy and solve problems for those affected by the COVID-19 epidemic.

Keywords:Participative Integration and Achieve ResultsLocal EconomicThe COVID – 19 Virus
How to Cite
Nopparat Chairueang (2024). The Driving of Participatory and Achievement-Focused Integration Process as A Solution to Grassroots Economy in The COVID 19-Era Using Management of Knowledge and Research to Benefit Community and Society: A Case Study of Nakhon Si Thammarat Province. Social Science and Humanities Journal, 8(07), 4400-4409. https://doi.org/10.18535/sshj.v8i07.1210

References

  1. Chakkrit Srisaeng. (2020, June). The impact of the COVID-19 Situation on Global Food Security. Journal of Agricultural Housing, 44 (6), 176-179.
  2. Foundation Economic Strategy Subcommittee. (2016). Manual for promoting the development of “System
  3. Grassroots Economy Strategy Subcommittee. (2016). Development Promotion Manual “Grassroots Economy System”. Bangkok: Bureau of Communication Development, Community Organization Development Institute
  4. Jutharat Laoprahman et al. (2021, January-June). Analysis of the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on airline businesses and future trends of the airline businesses after the outbreak. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 13 (1), 113-135.
  5. Thanachart Chotthanan and Kritchawat Lovacharintorn. (2019), July – December). Potential in economic development at the foundations of local government organizations in Udon Thani Province. Journal of Buddhist Studies and Research. 5(2), 15-27.
  6. Nipaphan Jensantikul. (2020, September – December). Labor in the Coronavirus (COVID-19) epidemic situation. Interdisciplinary Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. 3 (3,) 46-58.
  7. Nipaphan Jensantikul. (2020, September – December). Labor in the Coronavirus (COVID-19) epidemic situation. Interdisciplinary Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. 3 (3,) 32-45.
  8. Patchareerat Nava. (2019). The Role of Community Leaders and Sustainable Grassroots Economic Development. Collection of articles, Master of Public Administration Project. Bangkok: Ramkhamhaeng University.
  9. Pimchat Rosutham. (2015, February – May). Integration of social welfare management to solve poverty by using community as a base. Case Study of Wiang Tan Sub-District Community Lampang Province. Academic Social Science Journal Chiang Rai Rajabhat University. 8 (2), 78-91.
  10. Wichian Munlay et al. (2561). Effects and adaptation of people in the epidemic situation.epidemic of covid-19 Nakhon Si Thammarat Province. Journal of Mahachulanakorntas 8 (11), November, 2021.
  11. Hathaichanok Katasomboon. (2020, March - April), Developing Community Potential to Build a Sustainable Foundation Economy: A Case Study of Noen Sala Subdistrict, Krok Phra District, Nakhon Sawan Province. Journal of Peace Studies Perspective (Santi Suksa Paritas), KMU 8(2), 477-492.
  12. Orathai Euatrakul. (2020, May). Fruit logistics for export during COVID-19. Agricultural Housing Journal, 44 (5), 155-158.
  13. Ekachai Phumduang. (2014). Participative learning process of local wisdom based on economics. Community in Khok Kho Thao Subdistrict Suphanburi Province. Bangkok: Suan Dusit University
  14. Ansell, C. & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative Governance in Theory. University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, CA, United States
  15. Austin, J. E., & Seitanidi, M. M. (2012). Collaborative value creation: A review of partner-ing between nonprofits and businesses. Part 1: Value creation spectrum and collaboration stages. Nonprofit & Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 4(5). 726-758.
  16. BBC News. (2563). COVID-19: National Economic and Social Development Council: reveals the first quarter of 2020, nearly 400,000 unemployed people. Retrieved 3 June 2020, from https://www. bbc.com/thai /international-52829935.
  17. Capko, J. & Manag F. P. (2003). 5 Steps to a Performance Evaluation System. Fam Pract Manag. Mar; 10(3): 43-48.
  18. McKibbin, W. J. & Fernando, R. (2020). The Global Macroeconomic Impacts of COVID-19: Seven Scenarios. Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis. (March, 2020): 1- 43.
  19. Paul, W. & David, R. M. (2020). COVID-19: towards controlling of a pandemic. The lancet. 395: 1015-1018.
  20. Tepsongkroh. P. (2015). Natural Resources- Based Knowledge Management for Community Tourism in Satingpra District, Songkhla Province. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 10 (1), 9-33.