Tip: Try author name, DOI (10.xxxx/…), or keywords.

ISSN (Online): 2456-2653
Annals of Medicine and Medical Sciences
Submit Manuscript
  1. Home
  2. Vol. 9, No. 12, (2025)
  3. Influence of Childhood Environmental Factors on Prisoners: An Ecologic…
Open Access

Influence of Childhood Environmental Factors on Prisoners: An Ecological Systems Approach

Annals of Medicine and Medical SciencesVol. 9, No. 12, (2025) December 31, 2025pp. 9650-9672DOI: 10.18535/sshj.v9i12.2134
283 119
Abstract
Childhood is a critical stage of development that shapes emotional stability, social behaviour, and long-term life outcomes. Adverse childhood experiences and environmental factors increase vulnerability to substance abuse and criminal behaviour. Guided by Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Systems Theory, this study examines the influence of childhood environmental factors on prisoners with a history of drug addiction, focusing on interactions across the Microsystem, Mesosystem, Exosystem, Macrosystem, and Chronosystem. A descriptive survey design with a qualitative component was employed. A sample of 57 prisoners from an open prison camp in Kandy was selected based on the central limit theorem. Data were collected using a self-administered structured questionnaire aligned with the five ecological systems and supplemented by semi-structured interviews. Ethical approval and informed consent were obtained prior to data collection. Findings indicated that drug-related imprisonment occurred across all religious groups. Most respondents had low educational attainment, with the majority completing schooling only up to Grade 9, and were engaged in realistic jobs. The results demonstrate that imprisonment is the outcome of multiple interconnected childhood influences rather than a single factor. At the Microsystem level, family support, teachers, religious education, and access to medical care exerted positive influences, while peers and neighborhoods environments showed negative effects. Mesosystem interactions, particularly parent–teacher communication, were weak and inconsistent. Exosystem factors such as parents’ work conditions, school administration, economic challenges, and healthcare access negatively affected well-being. At the Macrosystem level, cultural and social influences were uneven, with limited access to technology and weak community organizational support. Chronosystem analysis revealed that personal and family-level transitions had a stronger influence than broader national or environmental events. Statistical analysis confirmed significant differences among the ecological systems (Friedman χ² = 153.045, df = 4, p < .001). The microsystem recorded the highest mean rank (4.49), indicating the strongest influence, while the Mesosystem recorded the lowest mean rank (1.60), and reflecting weak or uneven support. Pairwise comparison tests identified statistically significant differences in six out of ten system comparisons. These findings highlight the importance of strengthening protective childhood environments across all ecological levels to reduce substance abuse and criminal involvement.
References
  1. Anuradha, R. G. (2023). Impact of prisoner population on the prison rehabilitation process in Sri Lanka. Vidyodaya Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 8(1), 39–48.
  2. Astridge, B., Li, W., McDermott, B., Longhitano, C. (2023). A systematic review and meta-analysis on adverse childhood experiences: Prevalence in youth offenders and their effects on youth recidivism. Child Abuse & Neglect, 140. DOI:10.1016/j.chiabu.2023.106055
  3. Baglivio, M. T., & Epps, N. (2016). The relationship between adverse childhood experiences (ACE) and Juvenile Offending trajectories in a juvenile gffender sample. Journal of Criminal Justice, 43(3), 229-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2015.04.012
  4. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1992). Ecological systems theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Six Theories of Child Development (pp. 187–249). Jessica Kingsley.
  5. Conger, R. D., & Donnellan, M. B. (2007). An Interactionist Perspective on the Socioeconomic Context of Human Development. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 175–199. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085551
  6. Conger, R. D., Conger, K. J., & Martin, M. J. (2010). Socioeconomic status, family processes, and individual development. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 685–704. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00725.x
  7. DeLisi, M., Elbert, M., Caropreso, D., Tahja, K., Heinrichs, T., & Drury, A. (2017). Criminally explosive: Intermittent explosive disorder, criminal careers, and psychopathology among federal correctional clients. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 16(4), 293–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2017.1365782
  8. Department of Prisons, Sri Lanka. (2024). Annual report of prison (2024): Prison statistics of Sri Lanka (Vol. 43). Statistics Division. http://prisons.gov.lk/web/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/prison-statistics-2024.pdf
  9. Elder, G. H., Jr. (1998). The life course as developmental theory. Child Development, 69(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1998.tb06128.x
  10. Farrington, D. P., & Ttofi, M. M. (2015). Developmental and life-course theories of offending. In J. Morizot & L. Kazemian (Eds.), The development of criminal and antisocial behavior: Theory, research and practical applications (pp. 19–38). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08720-7_2
  11. Felitti, V. J., Anda, R. F., Nordenberg, D., Williamson, D. F., Spitz, A. M., Edwards, V., Koss, M. P., & Marks, J. S. (1998). Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults: The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) study. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 14(4), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(98)00017-8
  12. Flynn, K., & Mathias, B. (2023). How am I supposed to act?: Adapting Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Systems Theory to understand developmental impacts of multiple forms of violence. SAGE Journal, 40(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/07435584231159674
  13. Guy-Evans, O. (May, 2025). Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Systems. https://www.simplypsychology.org/bronfenbrenner.html
  14. Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., & Miller, J. Y. (2008). Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: Implications for substance abuse prevention. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 64–105. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.64
  15. Leventhal, T., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2000). The neighborhoods they live in: The effects of neighborhood residence on child and adolescent outcomes. Psychological Bulletin, 126(2), 309–337. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.2.309
  16. Masarik, A. S, & Conger, R. D. (2017). Stress and child development: A review of the family stress model. Current Opinion in Psychology,13, 85–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.05.008
  17. Masten, A. S. (2014). Global perspectives on resilience in children and youth. Child Development, 85(1), 6-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12205
  18. Masten, A., & Cicchetti, D. (2016). Resilience in development: Progress and transformation. In D. Cicchetti (Ed.), Developmental Psychopathology (pp. 271-333). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119125556.devpsy406
  19. Messina, N., & Grella, C. (2006). Childhood Trauma and Women's Health Outcomes in a California Prison Population. American Journal of Public Health, 96(10), 1842–1848. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2005.082016
  20. Repetti, R. L., & Saxbe, D. E. (2019). The influence of chronic family stressors on adult health. In B. H. Fiese, M. Celano, K. Deater-Deckard, E. N. Jouriles, & M. A. Whisman (Eds.), APA Handbook of Contemporary Family Psychology: Applications and Broad Impact of Family Psychology (pp. 121–136). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000100-008
  21. Smith, J. A. (Ed.) (2003). Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods. Sage Publications.
  22. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2018). World drug report 2018. United Nations.
  23. Van der Kolk, B. (2017). The body keeps the score: Brain, mind, and body in the healing of Trauma. Penguin Books.
  24. Viner, R. M., Ozer, E. M., Denny, S., Marmot, M., Resnick, M., Fatusi, A., & Currie, C. (2012). Adolescence and the social determinants of health. The Lancet, 379(9826), 1641–1652. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60149-4
  25. Wang, M. T., & Degol, J. L. (2016). School climate: A review of the construct, measurement, and impact on student outcomes. Educational Psychology Review, 28(2), 315–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9319-1
  26. Werner, E. E., & Smith, R. S. (1992). Overcoming the odds: High risk children from birth to adulthood. Cornell University Press.
  27. Wickramatilake, C. M., De Silva, B., Nanayakkara, T., Nanayakkara, R., & Gayashani, K. P. K. (2023). General health characteristics, psychological stress of inmates and living environment of a main prison in Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka Journal of Medicine, 32(1), 41–47.