ISSN 2456-2653
  1. 🏠 Home
  2. 📔 Vol. 9 · No. 09 · (2025)
  3. <b>Prevalence of Chemical Residues in Containerized Food Imp
Articles🔓 Open Access

<b>Prevalence of Chemical Residues in Containerized Food Imports at Dar es Salaam Port, Tanzania</b>

,
Social Science and Humanities JournalVol. 9 · No. 09 · (2025)📅 September 19, 2025pp. 9011-9018DOI: 10.18535/sshj.v9i09.2039
👁 228   ⬇ 136
📄 Download PDF
Abstract

This study quantified the prevalence and concentration of key chemical residues in containerized food imports at Dar es Salaam Port, Tanzania. A cross‐sectional design sampled fifty containers between March and May 2025. Pesticide residues (organophosphates, organochlorines, pyrethroids, neonicotinoids) were analyzed via QuEChERS extraction and GC-MS, and heavy metals (lead, cadmium) via acid digestion and AAS. Results showed that 44 % of containers contained pyrethroids (mean 0.72 mg/kg), 36 % contained lead (0.30 mg/kg), and 28 % contained organophosphates (0.40 mg/kg), each exceeding FAO/WHO MRLs. Organochlorines (20 %), neonicotinoids (16 %), and cadmium (24 %) were also detected. Over half of consignments harbored two or more residue classes, underscoring layered exposure risks. These findings mirror contamination patterns in other global ports and reveal critical gaps in pre-export testing, port laboratory capacity, and risk-based inspection regimes. The study recommends adopting multi-residue, high-throughput screening technologies, expanding rapid‐analysis capacity, and implementing data-driven inspection prioritization to safeguard consumer health and strengthen Tanzania’s food‐safety infrastructure.

Keywords:Solar energySocio-economic statusTungan jika village
How to Cite
Sylvester Mokiwa, Meli Mbeba (2025). <b>Prevalence of Chemical Residues in Containerized Food Imports at Dar es Salaam Port, Tanzania</b>. Social Science and Humanities Journal, 9(09), 9011-9018. https://doi.org/10.18535/sshj.v9i09.2039

References

  1. Diop, A., Sarr, M., & Ndiaye, P. (2019). Pesticide residues in containerized foods at West African ports: Prevalence and public health implications. Journal of Food Safety, 39(4), e12678.
  2. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfs.12678[DOI ↗]
  3. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority). (2021). Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance cypermethrin. EFSA Journal, 19(5), 6567.
  4. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6567[DOI ↗]
  5. Food and Agriculture Organization. (2021). Manual on pesticide residue analysis (3rd ed.). FAO.
  6. https://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/agphome/documents/Pests_Pesticides/JMPR/Manual/FAO_manual_3rd_edition_Final.pdf
  7. Nguyen, T. H., & Le, P. Q. (2020). Port laboratory capacity and pesticide residue compliance in Southeast Asia. Food Control, 112, 107124.
  8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107124[DOI ↗]
  9. Patel, R., & Singh, S. (2021). Chemical hazard detection in South Asian port imports: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Environmental Health, 18(2), 145–158.
  10. https://doi.org/10.1080/17435390.2021.1876543[DOI ↗]
  11. Smith, J. D., Müller, F., & Brown, L. (2020). Heavy‐metal contamination in spice imports: A European perspective. Food Chemistry, 332, 127380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127380[DOI ↗]
  12. Tanzania Ports Authority. (2023). Annual statistical report 2023.
  13. https://www.ports.go.tz/images/documents/TPABulletin.pdf
  14. World Health Organization. (2022). Guidelines for drinking-water quality (4th ed.). https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241549950
  15. World Organisation for Animal Health. (2022). Terrestrial Animal Health Code. https://www.oie.int/standard-setting/terrestrial-code-online-access/