Articles

Language, Communication and Law: Exposing Binary Opposition in the Pre-Adjudication Domain

Datir Siregar
Doctor of Law Program, Universities Jayabaya, Jakarta-Indonesia
Ramlani L. Sinaulan
Doctor of Law Program, Universities Jayabaya, Jakarta-Indonesia
Online First: January 28, 2020
| Google Scholar
[1]
D. Siregar and R. L. Sinaulan, “Language, Communication and Law: Exposing Binary Opposition in the Pre-Adjudication Domain”, sshj, vol. 4, no. 01, pp. 1744-1754, Jan. 2020.

Abstract

Language is the 'big house' for any science, there is no single science that does not use language as an intermediary instrument including the Law. Language in the field of law is used no more than a way to formulate laws and track fallacies. On the other hand, language in the form of speech as a form of communication, has never been seriously studied in Law. This study focuses on speech language models in verbal communication conducted by Investigators / Public Prosecutors with the community. The method used in this study is normative juridical based on secondary data in the form of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials obtained based on library research. Based on normative juridical research methods, we use several approaches, namely philosophical, conceptual, language, participatory and case approaches. Based on this, spoken language in verbal communication has a psychological impact on ordinary people who intersect with the law in the context of practice

References

[1] Hutahaean, E. S. H. (2015). Psikologi Kepolisian : Seragam, Pangkat dan Senjata Api. Prosiding PESAT 2015.
[2] De Camargo, C. (2012). The Police Uniform: Power, authority and culture. Internet Journal of Criminology Online) Internet Journal of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.1358/pojo.2009.82.3.485.

[3] Herzog, S. (2001). Militarization and demilitarization processes in the Israeli and American police forces: Organizational and social aspects. Policing and Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2001.9964861.
[4] Sidanius, J., Liu, J. H., Shaw, J. S., & Pratto, F. (1994). Social Dominance Orientation, Hierarchy Attenuators and Hierarchy Enhancers: Social Dominance Theory and the Criminal Justice System. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb00586.x.
[5] Hutahaean, E. S. H. (2015). Psikologi Kepolisian : Seragam, Pangkat dan Senjata Api. Prosiding PESAT 2015.
[6] Satria, R. (2016). Analisis Kasus Pembunuhan Dan Pemerasan Menggunakan Teori Linguistik Non-Kepengarangan: Sebuah Kajian Linguistik Forensik. Prosiding 1th Celscitech-UMRI, 1.
[7] Arifianti, I. (2007). Jenis Tuturan, Implikatur, dan Kesantunan dalam Wacana Rubrik Konsultasi Seks dan Kejiwaan pada Tabloid Nyata Edisi Maret s/d Agustus 2006 (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Negeri Semarang).
[8] Hestiyana, H. (2018). Kesantunan Tindak Direktif pada Tuturan Anak dan Orang Tua di Desa Ngumbul Kabupaten Pacitan. Madah: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 9(1), 101-116.
[9] Jeuland, E., & Sotiropoulou, A. (2012). The Role of Communication in the French Judicial System. International Journal for Court Administration. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.92.
[10] Geuss, Raymond. (2004). Ide Teori Kritis. Habermas & Mazhab Frankfurt, Magelang: Panta Rhei Books.
[11] Rachman, M. A. (2016). Penyelesaian Perselisihan Internal Partai Politik. Yuridika, 31(2), 189-219.
[12] Ediwarman, H. (2000). Perlindungan HAM Dalam Proses Peradilan (the Human Rights Protection in the Process of Justice). Indonesian Journal of Criminology, 1(1).
[13] Ungkang, M. (2013). Dekonstruksi Jaques Derrida sebagai Strategi Pembacaan Teks Sastra. Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora. https://doi.org/10.17977/JPH.V1I1.3919.
[14] Norris, Christopher. 2003. Membongkar Teori Dekonstruksi Jacques Derrida. Terjemahan Inyiak Ridwan Muzir. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz.
[15] McQuillan, M. (2017). Deconstruction: A Reader. In Deconstruction: A Reader. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315095066.
[16] Hardiman, F. B. (2015). Seni Memahami: Hermeneutik dari Schleiermacher sampai Derrida. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
[17] De Camargo, C. (2012). The Police Uniform: Power, authority and culture. Internet Journal of Criminology Online) Internet Journal of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.1358/pojo.2009.82.3.485.
[18] Herzog, S. (2001). Militarization and demilitarization processes in the Israeli and American police forces: Organizational and social aspects. Policing and Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2001.9964861.
[19] Sidanius, J., Liu, J. H., Shaw, J. S., & Pratto, F. (1994). Social Dominance Orientation, Hierarchy Attenuators and Hierarchy Enhancers: Social Dominance Theory and the Criminal Justice System. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb00586.x.
[20] Sinaulan, R. L. (2016). Memahami Perilaku Kekerasan Penyidik Polri terhadap Tersangka pada Tahapan Pra-Adjudikasi (Studi Kajian Ilmu Hukum Normatif Dengan Pendekatan Psikologi Hukum Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana). Psympathic : Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi. https://doi.org/10.15575/psy.v3i2.1110.
[21] Shanty, W. Y. (2016). Analisis Terhadap Fungsi Bahasa Indonesia Hukum Dalam Mewujudkan Kepastian Hukum. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 7(2), 268-280.
[22] Waljinah, S. (2016). Linguistik Forensik Interogasi: Kajian Implikatur Percakapan Dari Perspektif Makna Simbolik Bahasa Hukum. Prosiding Prasasti.
[23] West, R., & Turner, L. H. (2008). Pengantar teori komunikasi: analisis dan aplikasi. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.
[24] Norris, Christopher. 2003. Membongkar Teori Dekonstruksi Jacques Derrida. Terjemahan Inyiak Ridwan Muzir. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz.
[25] Geuss, Raymond. (2004). Ide Teori Kritis. Habermas & Mazhab Frankfurt, Magelang: Panta Rhei Books.
[26] Cohen, J. (2010) ‘Counseling’ an Innocent’s Guilty Plea. New York Law Journal. Volume 244. No. 114.
[27] Cohen, J. (2010) ‘Counseling’ an Innocent’s Guilty Plea. New York Law Journal. Volume 244. No. 114.
[28] Arief, BN. (2011). Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana: (Perkembangan Penyusunan Konsep KUHP Baru). Kencana. Jakarta.
[29] Marbun, S. F. (2001). Menggali dan Menemukan Asas-asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik Di Indonesia, dalam SF Marbun dkk, Dimensi-Dimensi Pemikiran Hukum Administrasi Negara.
[30] Marbun, R., & Wijaya, E. (2019). Language, Communication, and Law: Dismantling Binary Opposition in the Pre-Adjudication Sphere. Proceedings of First International Conference on Culture, Education, Linguistics and Literature, CELL 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.5-8-2019.2289787
[31] Darmaji, A. (2014). Dasar-Dasar Ontologis Pemahaman Hermeneutik Hans-Georg Gadamer. Refleksi. https://doi.org/10.15408/ref.v13i4.911
[32] Peters, G. J. Y., Ruiter, R. A., & Kok, G. (2014). Threatening communication: A qualitative study of fear appeal effectiveness beliefs among intervention developers, policymakers, politicians, scientists, and advertising professionals. International Journal of Psychology, 49(2), 71-79.
[33] Gershman, B. L. (2014). Threats and Bullying by Prosecutors. Loy. U. Chi. LJ, 46, 327.
[34] Gershman, B. L. (2014). Threats and Bullying by Prosecutors. Loy. U. Chi. LJ, 46, 327.
[35] Hardiman, F. B. (2015). Seni Memahami: Hermeneutik dari Schleiermacher sampai Derrida. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
[36] Kaelan. 2009. Filsafat Bahasa, Semiotika, dan Hermeneutika.Yogyakarta: Paradigma
Published January 28, 2020
Keywords
  • Language, Communication, Law, Criminal
How to Cite
[1]
D. Siregar and R. L. Sinaulan, “Language, Communication and Law: Exposing Binary Opposition in the Pre-Adjudication Domain”, sshj, vol. 4, no. 01, pp. 1744-1754, Jan. 2020.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Downloads

References

[1] Hutahaean, E. S. H. (2015). Psikologi Kepolisian : Seragam, Pangkat dan Senjata Api. Prosiding PESAT 2015.
[2] De Camargo, C. (2012). The Police Uniform: Power, authority and culture. Internet Journal of Criminology Online) Internet Journal of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.1358/pojo.2009.82.3.485.

[3] Herzog, S. (2001). Militarization and demilitarization processes in the Israeli and American police forces: Organizational and social aspects. Policing and Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2001.9964861.
[4] Sidanius, J., Liu, J. H., Shaw, J. S., & Pratto, F. (1994). Social Dominance Orientation, Hierarchy Attenuators and Hierarchy Enhancers: Social Dominance Theory and the Criminal Justice System. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb00586.x.
[5] Hutahaean, E. S. H. (2015). Psikologi Kepolisian : Seragam, Pangkat dan Senjata Api. Prosiding PESAT 2015.
[6] Satria, R. (2016). Analisis Kasus Pembunuhan Dan Pemerasan Menggunakan Teori Linguistik Non-Kepengarangan: Sebuah Kajian Linguistik Forensik. Prosiding 1th Celscitech-UMRI, 1.
[7] Arifianti, I. (2007). Jenis Tuturan, Implikatur, dan Kesantunan dalam Wacana Rubrik Konsultasi Seks dan Kejiwaan pada Tabloid Nyata Edisi Maret s/d Agustus 2006 (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Negeri Semarang).
[8] Hestiyana, H. (2018). Kesantunan Tindak Direktif pada Tuturan Anak dan Orang Tua di Desa Ngumbul Kabupaten Pacitan. Madah: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 9(1), 101-116.
[9] Jeuland, E., & Sotiropoulou, A. (2012). The Role of Communication in the French Judicial System. International Journal for Court Administration. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.92.
[10] Geuss, Raymond. (2004). Ide Teori Kritis. Habermas & Mazhab Frankfurt, Magelang: Panta Rhei Books.
[11] Rachman, M. A. (2016). Penyelesaian Perselisihan Internal Partai Politik. Yuridika, 31(2), 189-219.
[12] Ediwarman, H. (2000). Perlindungan HAM Dalam Proses Peradilan (the Human Rights Protection in the Process of Justice). Indonesian Journal of Criminology, 1(1).
[13] Ungkang, M. (2013). Dekonstruksi Jaques Derrida sebagai Strategi Pembacaan Teks Sastra. Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora. https://doi.org/10.17977/JPH.V1I1.3919.
[14] Norris, Christopher. 2003. Membongkar Teori Dekonstruksi Jacques Derrida. Terjemahan Inyiak Ridwan Muzir. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz.
[15] McQuillan, M. (2017). Deconstruction: A Reader. In Deconstruction: A Reader. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315095066.
[16] Hardiman, F. B. (2015). Seni Memahami: Hermeneutik dari Schleiermacher sampai Derrida. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
[17] De Camargo, C. (2012). The Police Uniform: Power, authority and culture. Internet Journal of Criminology Online) Internet Journal of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.1358/pojo.2009.82.3.485.
[18] Herzog, S. (2001). Militarization and demilitarization processes in the Israeli and American police forces: Organizational and social aspects. Policing and Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2001.9964861.
[19] Sidanius, J., Liu, J. H., Shaw, J. S., & Pratto, F. (1994). Social Dominance Orientation, Hierarchy Attenuators and Hierarchy Enhancers: Social Dominance Theory and the Criminal Justice System. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb00586.x.
[20] Sinaulan, R. L. (2016). Memahami Perilaku Kekerasan Penyidik Polri terhadap Tersangka pada Tahapan Pra-Adjudikasi (Studi Kajian Ilmu Hukum Normatif Dengan Pendekatan Psikologi Hukum Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana). Psympathic : Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi. https://doi.org/10.15575/psy.v3i2.1110.
[21] Shanty, W. Y. (2016). Analisis Terhadap Fungsi Bahasa Indonesia Hukum Dalam Mewujudkan Kepastian Hukum. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 7(2), 268-280.
[22] Waljinah, S. (2016). Linguistik Forensik Interogasi: Kajian Implikatur Percakapan Dari Perspektif Makna Simbolik Bahasa Hukum. Prosiding Prasasti.
[23] West, R., & Turner, L. H. (2008). Pengantar teori komunikasi: analisis dan aplikasi. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.
[24] Norris, Christopher. 2003. Membongkar Teori Dekonstruksi Jacques Derrida. Terjemahan Inyiak Ridwan Muzir. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz.
[25] Geuss, Raymond. (2004). Ide Teori Kritis. Habermas & Mazhab Frankfurt, Magelang: Panta Rhei Books.
[26] Cohen, J. (2010) ‘Counseling’ an Innocent’s Guilty Plea. New York Law Journal. Volume 244. No. 114.
[27] Cohen, J. (2010) ‘Counseling’ an Innocent’s Guilty Plea. New York Law Journal. Volume 244. No. 114.
[28] Arief, BN. (2011). Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana: (Perkembangan Penyusunan Konsep KUHP Baru). Kencana. Jakarta.
[29] Marbun, S. F. (2001). Menggali dan Menemukan Asas-asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik Di Indonesia, dalam SF Marbun dkk, Dimensi-Dimensi Pemikiran Hukum Administrasi Negara.
[30] Marbun, R., & Wijaya, E. (2019). Language, Communication, and Law: Dismantling Binary Opposition in the Pre-Adjudication Sphere. Proceedings of First International Conference on Culture, Education, Linguistics and Literature, CELL 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.5-8-2019.2289787
[31] Darmaji, A. (2014). Dasar-Dasar Ontologis Pemahaman Hermeneutik Hans-Georg Gadamer. Refleksi. https://doi.org/10.15408/ref.v13i4.911
[32] Peters, G. J. Y., Ruiter, R. A., & Kok, G. (2014). Threatening communication: A qualitative study of fear appeal effectiveness beliefs among intervention developers, policymakers, politicians, scientists, and advertising professionals. International Journal of Psychology, 49(2), 71-79.
[33] Gershman, B. L. (2014). Threats and Bullying by Prosecutors. Loy. U. Chi. LJ, 46, 327.
[34] Gershman, B. L. (2014). Threats and Bullying by Prosecutors. Loy. U. Chi. LJ, 46, 327.
[35] Hardiman, F. B. (2015). Seni Memahami: Hermeneutik dari Schleiermacher sampai Derrida. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
[36] Kaelan. 2009. Filsafat Bahasa, Semiotika, dan Hermeneutika.Yogyakarta: Paradigma
Published January 28, 2020
Keywords
  • Language, Communication, Law, Criminal
How to Cite
[1]
D. Siregar and R. L. Sinaulan, “Language, Communication and Law: Exposing Binary Opposition in the Pre-Adjudication Domain”, sshj, vol. 4, no. 01, pp. 1744-1754, Jan. 2020.
No Supplimentary Material available for this article.
Published January 28, 2020
Keywords
  • Language, Communication, Law, Criminal
How to Cite
[1]
D. Siregar and R. L. Sinaulan, “Language, Communication and Law: Exposing Binary Opposition in the Pre-Adjudication Domain”, sshj, vol. 4, no. 01, pp. 1744-1754, Jan. 2020.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Statistics from Dimensions.ai

Statistics from PlumX

Published January 28, 2020
Keywords
  • Language, Communication, Law, Criminal
How to Cite
[1]
D. Siregar and R. L. Sinaulan, “Language, Communication and Law: Exposing Binary Opposition in the Pre-Adjudication Domain”, sshj, vol. 4, no. 01, pp. 1744-1754, Jan. 2020.

Sections

We Recommend


Related Articles

Related Authors

 



In Google Scholar

In Social Science and Humanities Journal

In Google Scholar

 
  • Datir Siregar
  • Ramlani L. Sinaulan

  • Published January 28, 2020
    Keywords
    • Language, Communication, Law, Criminal
    How to Cite
    [1]
    D. Siregar and R. L. Sinaulan, “Language, Communication and Law: Exposing Binary Opposition in the Pre-Adjudication Domain”, sshj, vol. 4, no. 01, pp. 1744-1754, Jan. 2020.